20200615, 21:15  #342 
Mar 2006
Germany
2^{4}·3·61 Posts 
Sure, this Riesel k seems not done before (upto n=50k by me to cover the SophieGermain) and there're also no further entries in the Top5000 database.

20200616, 20:48  #343 
Jun 2020
11_{10} Posts 
50200k complete
The k value of 3382599 has now been searched up to 200,000. Throughout this process I have found a total of 12 primes. The first 50,000 was sieved to p = ~240 billion, and the last 100,000 to p = ~150 billion. I plan on searching higher. I may wait until 500k to post the next update. Thank you for your help :)
54947 57479 61748 65944 68904 74729 85652 95728 119717 120329 139875 157759 Last fiddled with by Nescro on 20200616 at 20:56 Reason: attachments 
20200616, 21:17  #344  
Dec 2011
After milion nines:)
10111001111_{2} Posts 
Quote:
One rule you must follow ( for your own good) : you should sieve much deeper as you go up with exponents. 

20200616, 22:39  #345 
Jun 2020
11_{10} Posts 
Yea that makes sense, thanks for the explanation. I just thought that it was taking longer to remove candidates with the sieve than it took to test each one with LLR tests. In the future ill try to sieve higher. Thanks for the tip :)

20200617, 00:56  #346 
"Sam"
Nov 2016
2^{3}·41 Posts 

20200617, 15:18  #347 
"Alexander"
Nov 2008
The Alamo City
2^{3}×97 Posts 
My work filling in the RPS 9th Drive k's has reached n=300k. I've attached the primes here, and I will also post them (and the smaller primes for these k's) to PrimeWiki.

20200623, 17:16  #348 
"Dylan"
Mar 2017
2×293 Posts 
update
k = 50171 reached 2.5 M, no primes found, continuing with the deep file provided to me from yoyo. Residues from the 1.52.5M range attached.

20200628, 01:03  #349  
Random Account
Aug 2009
1987_{10} Posts 
Quote:
By deeper, he means higher, as in trillions. I never sieve below threetrillion, and have gone as high as fivetrillion. Depending on your hardware, this can take several days. The more terms you can remove, the less time you will spend testing. 

20200628, 07:19  #350  
Dec 2011
After milion nines:)
1487_{10} Posts 
Quote:
Sweet spot is thousand trillions is a quadrillion :) Especially if it is done by external source (YOYO) , and will in total remove more then few more percent of total sieve size. And that is important if you work with huge candidates. 

20200628, 15:38  #351  
Random Account
Aug 2009
1,987 Posts 
Quote:
I rarely run any k's longer than five digits. Based on the formula's for calculating digits, larger k's would make little difference. n's, on the other hand, would make really large differences. Some here have the CPU horsepower to run really large n's in rapid succession with LLR. I do not. Above 700K, the performance dropoff is quite pronounced on my i7. It would be nice to run these on my GTX 1080, but that option is not available, as far as I know. 

20200628, 19:08  #352  
Dec 2011
After milion nines:)
1,487 Posts 
Quote:
https://github.com/galloty/proth20 

Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Best Work for Finding Primes  Unregistered  Information & Answers  9  20120624 13:50 
Which settings to choose for best work?  jmb1982  Software  2  20090407 09:33 
Help test 210885  Find a new top 5000 prime!  SlashDude  Riesel Prime Search  121  20080103 08:47 
Help test 2995125705  Find a new top 5000 prime!  SlashDude  Riesel Prime Search  538  20070508 01:42 
The fastest way to a top5000 prime?  lsoule  15k Search  13  20050919 20:24 