Hedegaard February 6, 2011 at 5:06 pm What is their deal with the hyperreals being contained in the “Imaginary Numbers” (where “Complex numbers” would have been a better term anyway)?
I suppose mentioning sedonions is out of the question, hmm?
What is their deal with the hyperreals being contained in the “Imaginary Numbers” (where “Complex numbers” would have been a better term anyway)?