On the Google one, I can get the rounding error but not the mysterious replacement of 2s with 5s?
Bryan Lee Williams
I put into Google:
200000000000002-200000000000001
and got
200 000 000 000 002 – 200 000 000 000 001 = 1
That Yahoo question just makes me pity those people.
The first one is not a fail, it’s a genuine question; the answer really is 14 unless you put brackets around the 2+3 bit. Then it’s 20. That had me confused for ages as well until I learnt what BODMAS meant.
CJ
and the commonsense fail goes to Al : P
Johnny
Order of operations dictates that multiplication is done first, brackets or not – the correct answer is 14.
On the Google one, I can get the rounding error but not the mysterious replacement of 2s with 5s?
I put into Google:
200000000000002-200000000000001
and got
200 000 000 000 002 – 200 000 000 000 001 = 1
That Yahoo question just makes me pity those people.
http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=2000000000000000000002-2000000000000000000001 works to give 0 instead of 1. You just need enough 0s.
The Yahoo one is fine, in the sense that order of operations is arbitrary, but not fine in the sense that someone could be a math grad student and not have learned that. Also the “i’ve been researching for two days” makes it a lot more pitiable.
The first one is not a fail, it’s a genuine question; the answer really is 14 unless you put brackets around the 2+3 bit. Then it’s 20. That had me confused for ages as well until I learnt what BODMAS meant.
and the commonsense fail goes to Al : P
Order of operations dictates that multiplication is done first, brackets or not – the correct answer is 14.